
Google Alerts for single dads waft into my Inbox every morning by the nice Google people.
Often they include great stories of single dads struggling to make it just like everyone else.
About half the time, though, the articles contain the dreaded Fatherless Gospel (If-dad’s-not-there-it-ain’t-a-family)–statistical “evidence” designed to show an effect of father-absence on families and kids.
I’m not sure where this stuff started but the National Fatherhood Initiative (paid for with YOUR US tax dollars) does a damned good job of laying it on thick and lots of journalists get their information there.
A few weeks ago I started Googling fatherlessness and lo and behold, in and amongst all the folks jumping on board with the fatherless effect, I found Liz. The first page I happened on was the page of US presidents and jurists growing up without fathers–except I didn’t realize that at first because it’s a long as your arm and figured I must be wrong. But I wasn’t! Go and check it out. (Pictured, George Washington, whose father died at age 10; Barack Obama, raised by a single mother)
Then there were the pages and pages of careful debunking of the Fatherless Gospel. Here’s an example of how the Liz Library picks apart of the fatherless arguments. Listen to this carefully. It’s a doozy. You’ve undoubtedly heard this statistic manipulated a dozen times before while people screech “FACT!” at you, which means you’re not supposed to open your mouth and shoot it down.
From this page: [The bracketed "Duh" is my editorial comment; the rest is from Liz]
___
Fact: Children growing up without a father in the home are many times more likely to have had a father who spent time in prison.
[JP: Duh] That’s why he was absent.
[Statistics suck, don't they. In addition, according to a report in the New York Times, a study among 1,000 girls in detention in Alameda, Los Angeles, San Diego and Marin counties, revealed that 54 percent of their mothers and 46 percent of their fathers had been locked up, indicating that the greatest predictor of criminality in girls is having a parent who has been incarcerated. (Kind of bodes against all those fatherhood programs who want to inject criminals into the life of yet more kids, doesn't it.) ]
Fact: The most significant predictor of criminality is having a parent or other close relative who exhibits anti-social behavior or has been incarcerated.
DiLalla, L. F., & Gottesman, I. I. (1989). Heterogeneity of causes for delinquency and criminality: Lifespan perspectives. Development & Psychopathology, 1 (4), 339-349.
Fact: “Taking all the evidence together, marital discord has a stronger relation with delinquency and aggression than parental absence.”
Loeber, R. and Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1986) ‘Family factors as correlated and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency’, in: M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds.) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol.7, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 77-78
Comment: “The single greatest predictor of who will wind up in prison is whether his father was in prison.”
Ivins, Molly, column August 30, 2000, re Bureau of Justice Statistics, commenting on the astounding growth of the Texas prison population.
___
And by the way, for those who are divorced or separated, there’s a ton of information on joint custody and other pertinent issues. But back to jail-time issue for a sec. I just heard this yappety-yap on someone’s website not two weeks ago from a poster who express moral outrage at the number of babies who would be born to single mothers this year because of this very “fact.” Makes you want to barf.
Filed under: critical thinking, fatherlessness, kids, solo life , families, father absence, fatherlessness, Google alerts, jail, National Fatherhood Initiative, single parents, statistics
Jumping up and down here say hell yeah! I am really, really loving these posts, really.
Thank you for these posts!! It is so interesting about the Presidents raised by single mothers, I had no idea.
Isn’t it a screech? I love it. And sometimes they weren’t even raised by their mothers either. . .sometimes by siblings.
Thanks for this! I’ll be posting a link to Liz’s site on my blog.
[...] he’s with FRAMED et al, but I really think it’s sinking lower than low to put this fatherless drivel in the mouth of Santa (pictured here in a typically hectoring stance). Santa has . . . firmly [...]
[...] about tone, eh? We’ve already dispensed with that particular statistical canard here (references included) but here’s a [...]
Let me first start by say that I think Ann Coulter has some major psychological issues, but I believe the importance of this point that she has brought up is being lost in all this petty Bickering about how much of an ass she’s making of herself. In short, you can play with the numbers as much as you like, but wether you look at it as A symptom of dysfunction or the cause unsupported single motherhood defiantly helps to perpetuate dysfunction in our society. If one gives it its due attention you would observe the reasons why this is true.
If you look at your own list of facts you will see that that all are likely to lead to single motherhood, and in turn single motherhood for whatever reason it may exist will likely lead to more of the same for the next generation.It is a vicious cycle and it matters not where you interrupt that cycle as long as you take action and do interrupt it. so I myself still see the value in these fatherhood programs. however maybe they should truly rehibilitate these fathers before they encourage then to go home and raise their kids.
Wow, you guys are actually relying on the LIZLIBRARY for information. You have got to be kidding me.
Look at her website, she doesn’t even make an effort to appear unbiased. Look at her ‘formula’ to see who is more likely to abuse kids.
For gods sake, she uses the word ASSUME 7 different times in her formula, and never once backs up her ASSUMPTION.