O Solo Mama

Single momhood, adoption, middle age. All together now.

Save the Children dishes the “orphans” statistics

The well-known international charity Save the Children has done its own research in Central and Eastern Europe, Indonesia, and Africa and has concluded that four out of five “orphans” have, in fact, one living parent, usually living in the same community as the orphanage.

According to Voice of America,

In a new report, the charity describes how children are treated as commodities in an industry that recruits children in order to profit from international adoption and child trafficking.

Louise Melville from Save the Children says in some countries running an orphanage is lucrative because, she says, governments and well-intentioned donors invest heavily in orphan care.

“Orphanages tend to attract a lot of donations from well meaning individuals, churches and other organizations,” she said. “And I think a lot of people don’t realize that the vast majority of children in those orphanages have one or both parents living in the same community as their child.”

Had a hard time locating the actual name of this report but I finally found it in this press release from Save the Children Canada. The report is called Keeping Children Out of Harmful Institutions. I have yet to find a link to the report itself, but the Canadian press release contains more information about the publication and the findings than the Voice of America article. Example, from the Canadian newswire:

In Central and Eastern Europe almost every child in an institution – 98% – has at least one living parent. In Indonesia that figure is at 94% and in Ghana 90%.

It’s time for everyone to retire the 143 million figure when talking about adoption.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life , , , , , , , ,

Hissyfit over Find My Family

ABC’s Find My Family airs today, Monday, November 23.

It’s about search-and-reunion. Period. That’s what the show is about. It is not a show about adoption or how great it is except as a backstory. From ABC:

The producer of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition created this show with one simple mission—to bring families back together. With the help of a dedicated team of researchers, hosts Tim Green and Lisa Joyner guide people searching for lost loved ones through the emotional journeys that will change their lives forever. Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: adoption, kids, life , , , , , , , ,

Adoption: Groan in my heart and the total bitter truth

This is not about My Lil’ Guatling, but something like it. It’s my own lil’ Guatling. Like your own lil’ Waterloo.

Last week, it got me kicked off an adoptive-parent list.

Admittedly, ignoring all Internet etiquette I shot my mouth off in another forum and someone learned my take on things. My comment was harsh, uncompromising, and personal. Also, maybe, I was hypocritical. By remaining on the list, I appeared to embrace a pejorative. Why stay? Because like any parent who adopted internationally and is now searching I welcomed any information about my daughter’s origins, though the list often made me angry. There was a full-blown discussion of Gotcha Day that was notable for peeling back not one micro-layer of advantage or entitlement.

I will not state the name of the group, the pejorative, or the phrase that reminds me of talking about your new Pomeranian.

(However, somebody pointed out to me that this post is hard to understand without some background. With that in mind, the issue is about China, an orphanage-assigned surname, and a word created out of the surname.)

I will only say this:

Appropriation of cultural expressions is never acceptable by adoptive parents. Taking the name of something that is filled with history, meaning, and loss and turning it into a jamboree is wrong. That name does not belong to us. We don’t own these girls, and we don’t own their history. As has been pointed out to me so often before, our children might one day revert to their original names. Though the idea basically stops my heart, what I accept is that our children only come to us because they were supposed to be in some other place, with some other people, and it all went south. Especially in the case of children named by orphanage staff, that surname represents no less than that total bitter truth.

It will be argued by some that the name doesn’t matter because the work of the group is to put girls from the same region in touch with each other. No one can challenge the goodness of that. But names do matter. In my twenties I attended a party full of wealthy couples where the hostess announced to her husband after inquiring about my background, “Get this little Greek girl a drink.” Across a lifetime that incident has remained my one-and-only encounter with ethnic prejudice, yet to this day I can still remember the room we were standing in and what I was wearing and how those words made me want to crawl under a rock. Imagining myself an adopted child in, say, Sweden, treking to “Our Little Athenas” every year and wearing a chiton would probably make me as mad as Tobias Hubinette. Seriously, you wonder?

Undoubtedly, the people in this group will swear that there is nothing nefarious about the name they have chosen to celebrate their daughters’ heritage. And there are girls in the group who are old enough to have an opinion and would think my position insults the good work of their parents. To them, I apoligize. And I accept that I handled it all wrong. I should have joined the group and objected to the name immediately and openly and let the chips fall where they may instead of venting on another forum and making it personal. That part wasn’t so nice.

About three months ago, something happened that brought things home for me. For years, my daughter’s health card carried her original Chinese name because of a glitch on her landing paper. When her permanent resident card was updated we took the opportunity to change her health card. Announcing the change to hospital staff at her most recent asthma appointment, I blurted out, “Yup, F- B—– ’s gone. It says Pegis,” and turned to see my daughter looking at me with absolute and COMPLETE horror and dismay. When we talked about it later I apologized, saying that this was an example of how it’s almost impossible for a non-adopted person to put herself in the place of an adopted person. And I promised never to do it again.

Because that name belongs to her and no one else and only she will decide how it is used.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life , , , , , , ,

Ohio letting moms raise children behind bars

Apparently, the number of women in prison just keeps going up and up in the United States. So Ohio has started a program that will let pregnant inmates give birth to, raise, and keep their babies in prison with them. Why?

Drum roll, please:

Some experts say that approach is best for both mothers and their children because the women are less likely to commit crimes when they get out, and children get to be with their moms during critical periods of their development.

The naysayers claim that prison is all about punishment and that kids don’t belong behind bars. But the research looks convincing at this point:

Programs for convicts and their babies are relatively new, and little research about their effectiveness has been done, according to [Chandra] Villanueva of the Woman’s Institute.

In her study, she found Ohio prison officials looked at the program at its five-year mark and found 118 mothers had participated, with just 3 percent of the women committing another crime within three years of being released. Of the general female prison population 30 percent commit another crime.

Only 3 percent of kids born in prison go into foster care, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics report, Parents in Prison and their Minor Children. The overwhelming majority live with the other parent or another family member. However, those figures most mostly describe the situation of men. Pregnant inmates have fewer options.

Filed under: adoption, fatherlessness, kids, life, solo life , , , , , , , ,

Child for Sale, unknown gender, Indiana, up to $39K

Last night I visited the Christian Adoption Blog where . . . OK, stupid thing I did. Commented on the children-for-sale listings known euphemistically as “adoption situations”.

To the untrained eye, it was noted (politely and without sarcasm) that they appear to be offering children for sale. Could they supply us with a financial breakdown? Needless to say, my comment has not been published.

Y’all know I paid. The money went to the first agency (lost the $5000 fee but we shut them down); new agency fee—around $1500; fee for the home study paid directly to the social worker; document fees paid directly to the various gov’t agencies involved; travel, hotel, and spending money for the mandatory 2-week stay in China (2 locations, 2 hotels); and the then-US$3000 orphanage donation. That added up to about CDN$20K. A huge chunk of the money went toward traveling to China and staying in hotels for two weeks. These people are doing domestic adoptions. ???

What’s weird and perverted is how in the current marketplace some of their “adoption situations” are worth $16K and some are worth $39K.

Why is that?

Can somebody please step up and explain why the African-American boy from Illinois costs $15K and the caucasian child of unknown gender in Indiana might fetch up to $39K?

All things being equal, why isn’t the fee standard and where does the $24K float go and why? To whom? For what purpose?

What the heck is an “adoption situation” and how is it indistinguishable from child-selling?

Note: This site has already been flagged by an adoptee blogger—Issycat, Ungrateful, or Addiepray. Can’t remember which one of you guys blogged about it, but I remember you did. Honestly, this stuff needs to be looked at.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life , , , , , , ,

Transracial adoption: Did you ever think you were white?

That’s what I asked my daughter this morning, after reading about Kim Eun Mi Young in the New York Times. In a story highlighting the release of the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute study on the challenges of trans-racial adoptees, Beyond Culture Camp, there was this paragraph:

“At no time did I consider myself anything other than white,” said Ms. Young, 48, who lives in San Antonio. “I had no sense of any identity as a Korean woman. Dating an Asian man would have forced me to accept who I was.”

And according to the Institute, about 78% of the other adoptees they interviewed had the same attitude she did. Many of them felt free to explore their identity and heritage only after moving away from their parents to more diverse neighbourhoods.

“So . . . did you ever think you were white?”

“Why do you want to know?”

“Because there was this story where a Korean adoptee who is in her 40s said she thought of herself as white while she was growing up in the US.”

Pause, pinching arm.

“Do you mean white skin?”

“No, I mean, did you ever think of yourself as anything other than Asian?”

“Nope. Isn’t it obvious?”

Ok, I thought—good check. We live in a place where white kids are now the minority at school (29%) and her friends are mostly non-white, but you never know what a child is thinking just because it is the most protective thing to think.

“Is there such a thing as yellow skin?” she asked abruptly, pulling the post-shower towel off her head.

“No, why?”

“Because when we were doing our film study yesterday, we were talking about skin colour and someone said some people are supposed to have yellow skin and C. looked at him and said, ‘Dude, Lisa on the Simpsons has yellow skin. Nobody human does.’”

“Well, she’s right. That is a stereotype. It used to be said that there were four skin tones—black, white, red, and yellow. That’s . . . uh, very passé now. (Thank goodness for smart kids who can talk about this stuff.)

Anyway, I had to wince at one of the anecdotes related in the Times piece that had to do with identity and reunion. One of the male adoptees from Korea, Joel Ballantyne, was talking about tracking down his relatives in Korea:

. . . Mr. Ballantyne said that while traveling to South Korea was an eye-opening experience in many ways, it was also disheartening.

Many Koreans, they said, did not consider them to be “real Koreans” because they did not speak the language or seem to understand the culture.

Mr. Ballantyne tracked down his maternal grandmother, but when he met her, he said, she scolded him for not learning Korean before he came.

“She was the one who had put me up for adoption,” he said. “So that just created tension between us. Even as I was leaving, she continued to say I needed to learn Korean before I came by again.”

Wonder if he did.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life, solo life , , , , , , , , ,

What does adoption reform mean to you?

Go here, everyone. It’s hot.

Filed under: adoption, fatherlessness, kids, life, solo life , ,

Adoption: Thinking about my daughter’s first mother

I do fantasize about Simone’s first mother.

She is the woman who joins our Curves workout around 9:40, about 10 minutes before we wrap up. Asian, small, slim, in her 40s and you could bounce the proverbial coin off her. It’s more what she projects mentally. Her hair is neat, chin length, and she always wears a cool T-shirt in a cool colour.

At our location, we’re now supposed do extra moves at the mats. A piece of paper in front of each mat has a drawing on it and some instructions. A punch here, a kick there. She does all the moves and more. I believe she makes up her own moves too. If my daughter saw her on TV, she would immediately label her “feisty-tush”–her newly minted word for somebody old (25 and up) who still has brisk locomotion.

When I mumble to my Curves buddy about life, work, or H1N1, this woman often looks over at us and grins.

I know she has nothing to do with me or with my daughter. She is little more than condensation on a window, something breathed out of my own longings and fears.

But that must be how it starts, right?

How you form the picture of someone who might be connected to you?

You look first at the people you’d like to be connected with.

Tradition and demographics suggest that S’s first family is likely to live in a rural area, as this is the largest group that surrenders girls. Then again, they might not; my daughter was found outside a police station in a city with a population of 3,700,000. There may be an older sister, or possibly a younger boy. Or multiple daughters ferried away through international adoption to different families. The fact is, you can’t predict any of this stuff. You can only look at what’s most likely and you could still be dead wrong.

If farmers, her parents could be comfortably well-off or extremely poor—the distance between those two possibilities hard to fathom. The poorest areas of the countryside are places where it’s harder to grow food and people have literally nothing. From a 1999 New York Times article:

In a crumbling mud-brick house, nestled against the untidy heap that holds her family’s entire wardrobe, Zheng Xingrong defines her life with a series of emphatic negatives.

How often do your children eat eggs or meat? ”Never!” Do you have a radio or television? ”No!” Is your 14-year-old daughter in school? ”No!” Does your 8-year-old boy have any toys? ”None!”

Stops your heart, doesn’t it? And yet, that is exactly how this could end. What would any of us do, I wonder, after coming face-to-face with poverty this complete. I hang my head as Zheng Xingrong has a way of waving my own fantasies in my face and saying one more time,“No!”

Why should any of this be easy? It didn’t start out that way.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life, solo life , , , , , , ,

Adoption: Born in the Federal Prison for Women

Deborah Jiang Stein has sent me an article she just published with Adoptive Families. It’s called Second Chances, and it details her discovery of being born in the Federal Prison for Women at Alderson, West Virginia. How she found out was . . . whew . . . her a-mom wrote the family attorney trying to change the place of Stein’s birth so she would never know she was born in prison. Stein found the letter.

Stein later went on to volunteer in the prison system and adopted her two daughters from China.

This is a thought-provoking piece that lots of people will have different opinions about. The theme of “second chances” will no doubt irritate some. I urge you to go and comment.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life , , , , , , ,

Elizabeth Bartholet mourns international adoption slowdown

On November 6, 2009, Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Bartholet will testify before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights regarding the “Human Rights of Unparented Children and International Adoption Policies” in the Americas. Adoption from Guatemala, Honduras, and Peru will be highlighted.

Bartholet is presenting along with Paulo Barrozo and Karen Bos, who provide additional legal (Barrozo) and scientific (Bos) evidence that slowing down international adoption–even in the face of documented corruption–amounts to a human rights violation and why human infants need “nurturing parenting,” not institutionalization.

You can find the presentation, along with slides, here.

Bartholet is a fierce advocate of international adoption who once said:

Adoption abuses exist, as in every area abuses of the legal system exist. But there is no persuasive evidence that adoption abuses are extensive. Nor is there reason to think that they would be extensive.

Evidence of corruption in the three aformentioned countries has been widely documented. Go here and click on the individual countries in the country list.

A few paragraphs from her upcoming presentation:

International Adoption functioned in the past to place many thousands of children per year from these three countries in permanent nurturing homes, with many placed as young infants, giving them a good chance for normal development. International Adoption has now been largely shut down in these countries, reducing the total number of children placed in the United States to less than 1% of the number placed in the peak placement years. Placement for even those relatively few children typically occurs only after lengthy, damaging periods in institutional care. There continue to be very few domestic adoptive homes available in these countries, nowhere near enough for the children in need. Almost no domestic homes exist for older children or children with disabilities.

The many thousands of children per year who could have been placed in permanent nurturing families abroad are now almost certainly languishing in institutions or on the streets. Our information is that growing numbers of children are now crowding the existing institutions, and new institutions are being built.

Many of the children in institutions are orphaned, or have been abandoned. While many others have biological parents who can be identified, very few of these children will ever be sent home to live with those parents, either because of inadequate welfare support, or because of parental unfitness. Yet there is no adequate system to identify children who should be freed for adoption.

. . .

Similarly there is dispute about the impact of shutting down International Adoption, and whether it is more likely to stimulate domestic reforms helpful for children, or to harm children as we believe the facts show. And we need more specific information about the number of children held in institutions, the length of time they are held, the conditions in which they live, and the harm they suffer. We need more specific information about the parental status of children held in institutions, the need for systems identifying those who should be freed for adoption, the nature of current adoption regulation, and the need for adoption reform ensuring that as many children in need of homes as possible be placed as early in life as possible.

Bartholet’s presentation ends with reference to “the egregious violations of children’s rights in Guatemala, Honduras, and Peru” that occur when they are not adopted.

Filed under: adoption, kids, life , , , , , ,

Ms Single Mama

Single Parent Blogs Kick Butt


O Solo Mama - Blogged

Progressive Bloggers

Twitter Moms: The Influential Moms Network

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

No part of this website may be reproduced for articles in print media without permission of the author. Material on this website may be quoted freely in other blogs as long as it is credited. Please contact Jessica Pegis at jessica.pegis@rogers.com

 

November 2009
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Follow my Tweets!